Skip to content

update docs with directories info OD-183#2698

Merged
nedaKaighobadi merged 5 commits into
masterfrom
directories
Jul 10, 2026
Merged

update docs with directories info OD-183#2698
nedaKaighobadi merged 5 commits into
masterfrom
directories

Conversation

@nedaKaighobadi

@nedaKaighobadi nedaKaighobadi commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👀 Live preview

https://directories--docs-codacy.netlify.app/repositories/files/

🚧 To do

  • If relevant, include the Jira issue key at the end of the pull request title
  • Perform a self-review of the changes
  • Fix any issues reported by the CI/CD

@nedaKaighobadi nedaKaighobadi requested a review from a team as a code owner July 10, 2026 08:40
@github-actions github-actions Bot temporarily deployed to Netlify July 10, 2026 08:41 Inactive
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Overall readability score: 54.27 (🔴 -0.03)

File Readability
files.md 71.77 (🔴 -1.94)
obtaining-code-quality-metrics-for-files.md 44.8 (🔴 -4.96)
View detailed metrics

🟢 - Shows an increase in readability
🔴 - Shows a decrease in readability

File Readability FRE GF ARI CLI DCRS
files.md 71.77 56.15 9.08 9.4 10.03 6.48
  🔴 -1.94 🔴 -1.22 🔴 -0.42 🔴 -0.6 🔴 -0.06 🔴 -0.02
obtaining-code-quality-metrics-for-files.md 44.8 36.39 13.31 12.2 11.95 9.49
  🔴 -4.96 🔴 -8.96 🔴 -0.59 🔴 -0.7 🔴 -0.53 🔴 -0.22

Averages:

  Readability FRE GF ARI CLI DCRS
Average 54.27 43.28 10.89 12.3 12.24 8.02
  🔴 -0.03 🔴 -0.04 🟢 +0 🔴 -0.01 🟢 +0 🟢 +0
View metric targets
Metric Range Ideal score
Flesch Reading Ease 100 (very easy read) to 0 (extremely difficult read) 60
Gunning Fog 6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read) 8 or less
Auto. Read. Index 6 (very easy read) to 14 (extremely difficult read) 8 or less
Coleman Liau Index 6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read) 8 or less
Dale-Chall Readability 4.9 (very easy read) to 9.9 (extremely difficult read) 6.9 or less

@codacy-production

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

Run reviewer

TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the documentation for the Files page to include details about browsing by folder and directory-level quality metrics. A review comment correctly identified an incorrect API documentation link for directory-level metrics, which should be updated to point to the correct file.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

Comment thread docs/repositories/files.md Outdated

@codacy-production codacy-production Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

The documentation updates successfully introduce folder-level navigation and metric aggregation concepts as intended. However, there are technical inaccuracies that should be addressed before merging, specifically regarding API documentation links.

Additionally, there is a significant discrepancy between the linked Jira ticket (which pertains to customer feedback segments) and the PR content (which is documentation for directory-level metrics). The PR description is currently empty, which lacks necessary context for reviewers.

About this PR

  • There is a significant misalignment between the Jira ticket OD-183/ODIN-183 and the actual changes. The ticket appears to focus on 'customer feedback segments,' whereas this PR provides documentation for directory-level metrics. Please verify the ticket reference.
  • The PR description is empty and the template checkboxes have not been completed. Please provide a summary of changes to assist with the review process and documentation history.

Test suggestions

  • Verify the 'Browsing by folder' section correctly describes navigation and the directory summary bar.
  • Verify each quality metric (Grade, Issues, etc.) has a clear definition for its folder-level aggregated value.
  • Verify the note section correctly links to API documentation for directory metrics.

TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback

Comment thread docs/repositories/files.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/repositories/files.md
@github-actions github-actions Bot temporarily deployed to Netlify July 10, 2026 12:27 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions Bot temporarily deployed to Netlify July 10, 2026 12:33 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions Bot temporarily deployed to Netlify July 10, 2026 12:45 Inactive
@nedaKaighobadi nedaKaighobadi merged commit 1103ebd into master Jul 10, 2026
5 checks passed
@nedaKaighobadi nedaKaighobadi deleted the directories branch July 10, 2026 13:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants